Understanding Corporate Contributions to OS

[pia (piamancini)]

The following people put their name down to continue the conversation on this topic:
Michael McAndrew
Duane O’Brien (corporate OSS responsibility)

[jwf (Justin W. Flory (he/him))]

I think it is safe to call these threads as the beginning of those working groups:

Principles of Authentic Participation: continuing the Sustain conversation

Hi folx! This thread is one place to continue the conversation from Sustain 2020 about Principles of Authentic Participation and creating a resource we can take back to our organizations to advocate for authentic contributions in open source communities. Purpose To define a core set of principles of what authentic participation means in multiple contexts (e.g. corporate, individual, humanitarian/NGO, etc.). These principles can be used as a starting place for future work, such as a best practi…

Open Source Accountability Goals: Defining A Transparency Goal

Continuing a pair of working sessions at Sustain 2020 in Brussels, this working group will define a goal that encapsulates the need for transparency when interacting with the open source community. Context There were two sessions at Sustain that worked to define what it looked like for a company to be a good member of the open source community NOTES The discussion led to the idea of defining a set of Open Source Accountability Goals. By defining a set of goals, companies could then set targets…

Ethics Working Group

Is Open Source ethical? What are the ramifications of bad actors in open source, and how can we work together to move beyond ethical boulders on the path to sustainability? Bottom liner: Chris Chinchilla Issues & Pull Requests: Add Ethics group #253

So, marking this thread as resolved.